Editorial Policies

Welcome to the "Editorial Policies" section of the International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal "Expert". Our commitment to scholarly integrity is the cornerstone of our publication philosophy. This section delineates the ethical standards and procedural guidelines that govern the conduct of all participants in the publication process of our journal.
Scope and Purpose:
These policies serve to ensure the integrity of our interdisciplinary academic exchange and uphold the highest standards of scientific research and publication.
Responsibilities of Authors:
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors are expected to submit original work and appropriately cite content from other sources.
Data Access and Retention: Authors may be asked to provide raw data related to their manuscript for editorial review.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication: Authors should not publish the same research in more than one journal as original work.
Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, execution, or interpretation of the reported study.
Responsibilities of Editors:
Decision on the Manuscript: Editors are responsible for deciding which of the submitted papers should be published based on the validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers.
Confidentiality: Editors must treat received manuscripts for review as confidential documents.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by the editor for their own research without explicit written consent from the author.
Responsibilities of Reviewers:
Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communications with the author, may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments.
Responsibilities of the Publisher:
Handling of Unethical Publishing Behavior: In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editor, will take appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question.
Access to Journal Content: The publisher is committed to the permanent availability and preservation of scholarly research and ensures accessibility by partnering with digital archives.
Complaints and Appeals:

• The journal has a clear procedure for handling complaints and appeals from authors, reviewers, and editors concerning the handling of manuscripts or published content.

Transparency and Open Communication:

• The journal encourages scholarly debate and promotes transparency in the research process by enabling open communication and ethical discussion between all involved parties.

By visiting this section, authors, editors, and reviewers agree to abide by these policies, ensuring that Journal continues to serve as a beacon of high-quality, ethical, and influential scholarly publishing.